Nifong Case Becomes Cause For Race Baiting

Just when I thought I was done with this guy who shouldn't be able to even drive by a court room, I see this story, by Alton Maddox Jr. who himself lost his license by defending a woman who was raped by men in New York City. The woman was also black and the men, white. Her and her mother were subpoenaed, but fled New York, where a warrant still awaits them to this day. Why not testify? Alton made this racial when he called the Assistant District Attorney Steven Pagones a racist and a rapist. The lawyers that represented the woman were all disbarred, sued and ordered to pay up to $345,000 for damages. Al Sharpton, refused to apologized and had a friend pay his share of the damages. So now that we know who wrote the following and where Mr. Alton Maddox is coming from, lets move forward into this deep deep well of race baiting.
Where o where do I begin with this piece? Let me start here. This piece begins by citing an op-ed from the Wall Street Journal, a conservative paper (most of the time) to be sure, which calls the whole thing a scandal. This story goes on to say this, which is what set me off to begin with.

This term should have no relationship to a prosecutor seeking justice for a sexually abused woman of African ancestry. To be sure, a prosecutor charging white, privileged males for the sexual abuse of a Black woman is unprecedented. Thus, Durham District Attorney Michael Nifong is a traitor to the history and precepts of white supremacy.

This goes back to what Rush has said many times, that this case is nothing more than white rich men versus a helpless black woman. Never mind actual facts and what courts still use in some places called evidence. This woman had none. Scratch that. She had more DNA with her than Paris Hilton on an all weekend party binge, and yet none of it matched the three accused. He goes on to say that black people are still brainwashed by Civil War era thinking.

Before the Civil War, courts routinely ruled that it was legally impossible for a white man to rape a Black woman. Today, through media and politics, most Blacks still embrace pre-Civil War law. This results from brainwashing. See “The Manchurian Candidate.” The only antidote to propaganda is critical thinking.

The only antidote to this propaganda is not listening to this racist who wrote this article. Now I have to be honest here. I am still brainwashed by pre-Revolutionary War thinking. Just the other day I was going to drink some tea before I went to the post office to buy some stamps. Then I remembered those Imperialistic Brits and felt so powerless. I know that happened hundreds of years ago, but I still can't get over it and move on. I wonder if like me, Jews feel brainwashed from 400 years of slavery by Egypt? Everytime they see a pyramid they must shudder. Folks, I joke, but you have to see the irony. The race card continues:

These players engaged in identity theft to secure the presence of two Black strippers for a KKK-type rally. They gave false names to the escort service. The escort service was never told that two Black females would have to perform before a white mob of drunken, racist hooligans. This is criminal fraud.

I should remember that the next time I order pizza, if that delivery driver is black, if I don't tell them that I am white, FRAUD!!! When should we ever tell what race we are for a service, especially one like an escort service? Here is an example that would make this author proud:

"Umm hello, yes I was wondering if I could score some dancers. What, all you have are black chicks, mmm (sigh) alright not what we wanted, seeing as how we are rich AND white. I should tell you we are white and we will be drinking. Did I mention that we are white? Is that a problem?"

Is that what they should have done? Now who is bringing race into the matter? Why must the color of skin make any kind of difference? Because there are people in positions of power that use this to control that power over the American people. I wonder where this guy got his law degree? Must have been mail order:

The media and the defense lawyers in the Duke case have misled the public. In every lawsuit, there are two methods of proof: direct and circumstantial. Of the two methods of proof, circumstantial evidence is the strongest. No need exists for direct evidence in this case.

In the words of Glenn Beck, I'm no lawyer, but I am a thinker. I would think that direct evidence, would mean more. Actual facts that provide truth as opposed to the lies of a woman who has no idea when she was raped, how many men there were, nor what they looked like. But they were white so they had to have done it, despite any evidence.

The op-ed he cites from the Wall Street Journal can be found here.